Category: Thermoforming mold

Effects of Thermoforming Parameters on Carbon Fiber Thermoplastic Composites

Discover the effects of thermoforming parameters on woven carbon fiber fabric/polycarbonate thermoplastic composites, including optimal values for spring-back angle, mold shape fitness, and key parameters for composite molds.

The quality of woven carbon fiber fabric/polycarbonate thermoplastic composites after thermoforming and demolding has been a subject of considerable research, especially for applications in industries that require SMC molds and composite molding. These composites are critical in sectors utilizing compression molds and carbon fiber molds.

This study investigates the effects of thermoforming parameters using a combination of finite element simulation and the Taguchi orthogonal array. The simulation model employed a discrete approach with a micro-mechanical model to describe the deformation behavior of the woven carbon fiber fabric, similar to what is seen in thermoforming molds and compression tooling. In parallel, a resin model was incorporated to ensure accurate simulations. This approach was validated through bias extension tests conducted at five different temperatures, providing essential data on material behavior during the thermoforming process, much like processes involving BMC molds and press molds.

composite

Key Thermoforming Parameters

The study focused on three key thermoforming parameters, each having three levels, similar to those considered in compression molding:

  • Blank Temperature: Influences the material’s flexibility and ability to conform to mold shapes, crucial in SMC tooling and BMC molding.
  • Mold Temperature: Affects the final shape fitness and surface finish of the composite, often impacting thermoforming molds and SymaLITE molds.
  • Blank Holding Pressure: Plays a crucial role in keeping the material in place and ensuring consistent molding, essential for composite molds like SMC moulds and carbon fiber molds.

The objective was to optimize four important quality factors: fiber-enclosed angle, spring-back angle, mold shape fitness, and the strain of the U-shaped workpiece, similar to those in thermoset molds and LFT molding. By adjusting the thermoforming parameters, the study aimed to achieve the best combination of these factors across various composite tooling methods.

mold

Results and Analysis

The finite element simulation revealed that the stress-displacement curve obtained from bias extension tests closely matched the simulated results. This verified the reliability of the discrete finite element method used in this study, which has parallels with the validation processes for SMC molding and press tooling.

Moreover, the Taguchi orthogonal array analysis identified blank holding pressure as the dominant process parameter, much like in compression molds and BMC tooling. The optimal value for blank holding pressure was found to be 1.18 kPa, making it the most critical factor in the thermoforming process. Blank temperature was the second most influential factor, with an optimal range of 160°C to 230°C. Interestingly, mold temperature had a relatively minor effect on the final composite quality, similar to the behavior observed in GMT molds and D-LFT molds.

Optimal Thermoforming Settings

The study recommended the following optimal settings for the thermoforming of woven carbon fiber fabric/polycarbonate thermoplastic composites:

  • Blank Holding Pressure: 1.18 kPa (critical for compression molds and SMC moulds)
  • Blank Temperature: 230°C (relevant for thermoforming tools and hot compression molds)
  • Mold Temperature: 190°C (beneficial for composite molding and carbon fiber molds)

These settings resulted in the most favorable outcomes for all four quality factors, indicating that careful control of blank holding pressure and temperature is crucial for achieving high-quality composite molds and thermoforming molds.

The-model-of-the-thermoforming-process

Conclusion

In summary, the results of this study provide valuable insights into the effects of thermoforming parameters on woven carbon fiber fabric/polycarbonate thermoplastic composites. The study concluded that blank holding pressure and blank temperature are the two most important factors, with mold temperature playing a secondary role. These findings are essential for those working with composite tooling, thermoforming tools, and compression molds, providing a clear pathway for producing high-quality composites with desirable spring-back angle, fiber-enclosed angle, and mold shape fitness.

What is the Difference Between a Positive Mold and a Negative Mold in Thermoforming?

Discover the differences between positive and negative molds in thermoforming, and explore how they impact composite mold, compression mold, SMC mold, BMC mold, carbon fiber mold, and thermoforming mold applications.

Thermoforming is a widely used process in the manufacturing industry, especially when producing plastic components. The process involves heating a plastic sheet until it becomes pliable and then shaping it against a mold. In thermoforming, the mold type plays a crucial role in determining the final product’s quality, accuracy, and surface finish. Two primary types of molds are used in this process: the positive mold (also known as the male mold) and the negative mold (also known as the female mold). Understanding the differences between these molds is essential for anyone involved in thermoforming or related fields such as composite mold and compression mold manufacturing.

compression-molding

Positive Mold (Male Mold)

A positive mold, or male mold, is a type of mold where the material is formed over the exterior surface. The mold itself represents the shape that will be transferred to the inner surface of the final product. This means that the material is stretched over the mold, with the exterior of the material taking the shape of the mold’s exterior.

Key Characteristics of Positive Molds:

  • Surface Finish: The outer surface of the product directly contacts the mold, providing a high-quality finish on the internal surface. This is ideal for applications where the inner surface’s texture or appearance is critical.
  • Material Stretching: The plastic sheet is stretched over the mold, which can lead to thinning in areas, especially around corners and edges.
  • Application: Positive molds are often used when the internal dimensions are more important than external ones. For example, in applications involving thermoforming molds for containers or trays, where the inside must be smooth and accurate.
thermoforming

Negative Mold (Female Mold)

A negative mold, or female mold, is the inverse of a positive mold. In this case, the material is drawn into the mold, allowing the outer surface of the material to match the mold’s interior. The external surface of the final product mirrors the internal surface of the negative mold.

Key Characteristics of Negative Molds:

  • Surface Finish: The outer surface of the product takes the finish of the mold’s interior. This results in a high-quality surface on the exterior of the final product.
  • Material Thickness: Since the material is drawn into the mold, it tends to maintain a more consistent thickness, which is beneficial for applications requiring uniform strength.
  • Application: Negative molds are used when the external appearance and dimensions of the product are critical. This is common in composite molds and compression molds, where external aesthetics are important.

Comparing Positive and Negative Molds

Both positive and negative molds have their advantages and limitations, and the choice between them depends on the specific requirements of the application.

  • Surface Quality: Positive molds offer a superior finish on the internal surface, whereas negative molds provide a better finish on the external surface.
  • Material Distribution: Negative molds tend to produce parts with more uniform wall thickness, making them ideal for applications requiring consistent material strength.
  • Design Flexibility: Positive molds may lead to thinning in the material at sharp corners, which could be a limitation in certain designs.
thermoforming moulding

Applications in Composite Molding

The principles of positive and negative molds extend beyond traditional thermoforming into the realm of composite molding. In composite molds used for producing high-performance parts, such as carbon fiber molds, the choice between positive and negative molds can impact the final part’s structural integrity and surface quality.

  • SMC Mold and BMC Mold: Both Sheet Molding Compound (SMC) and Bulk Molding Compound (BMC) processes utilize molds that must withstand high pressures and temperatures. Here, the choice of a positive or negative mold can affect the part’s surface texture and material flow.
  • Carbon Fiber Mold: In carbon fiber mold manufacturing, the mold type influences the fiber alignment and resin distribution, crucial for achieving the desired strength-to-weight ratio.

Conclusion

Understanding the difference between positive and negative molds in thermoforming is essential for optimizing the manufacturing process. Positive molds provide high-quality internal surfaces but can lead to material thinning, while negative molds offer uniform material distribution and superior external finishes. Whether in traditional thermoforming or advanced composite molding applications, choosing the right mold type is crucial for achieving the desired product characteristics. As technologies evolve, the principles behind positive and negative molds continue to shape industries ranging from packaging to aerospace, highlighting their ongoing importance in manufacturing.